Decision of the Regional Court in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, dated 28th October 2014
I C 862/12

The Regional Court in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge:            Izabella Dyka, Regional Court Judge

Judges:                            Elżbieta Bednarczuk, Regional Court Judge;

Kamil Grzesik, Regional Court Judge

having examined on 28th October 2014, in Kraków, at a session in camera, the case brought by D. N. – representative of a group consisting of: [data of 49 persons], against (…) with its registered office in N. for payment

Decision of the Court of Appeal in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, dated 26th March 2014
I ACz 417/14

  1. At the initial stage of the proceedings, which is the filing of a lawsuit and the court’s analysis of the admissibility of hearing the case in group proceedings, the assessment is, by its nature, based on the facts presented by the members of the group in the lawsuit filed; the domain of further proceedings conducted by the court, which will result in a judgment being issued in the case, is, among other things, to verify the claims and factual circumstances presented by the members of the group; the basis for issuing a decision on the admissibility of the case in group proceedings is the claim filed by the plaintiff and the factual circumstances contained therein, compared with the provisions of Articles 1 and 2 of the Act on Pursuing Claims in Group Proceedings.
  2. Securing the costs of proceedings in group proceedings is optional. The court makes a decision in this regard after analyzing the request submitted by the defendant.

Decision of the Regional Court in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, dated 28th November 2013
I C 862/12

The Regional Court in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge:           Izabella Dyka, Regional Court Judge

Judges:                            Paweł Darmoń, Regional Court Judge;

Kamil Grzesik, Regional Court Judge

having examined on 28th November 2013, in Kraków, at a hearing, the case brought by D. N. – representative of a group consisting of: [data of 49 persons] against (…) with its registered office in N. for payment

Decision of the Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, dated 7th June 2021
I C 1664/18

The Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge:           Mariusz Bartnik, Regional Court Judge

Judges:                            Ewa Karwowska, Regional Court Judge;

Monika Bakuła-Steinborn, Regional Court Judge

having examined on 7th June 2021, in Gdańsk, at a session in camera, the case brought by A. S. (1) – representative of the group consisting of [data of 2 group members] and others against (…) JSC with its registered office in S. for authorization to act as a substitute,

Decision of the Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, dated 21st June 2019
I C 1664/18

The Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge:                 Mariusz Bartnik, Regional Court Judge

having examined on 21st June 2019, in Gdańsk, at a session in camera, the case brought by A. S. – representative of the group against (…) JSC with its registered office in S. for authorization to perform actions at the expense of the defendant,

Decision of the Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, of 13th November 2019
I C 1664/18

The Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge:           Mariusz Bartnik, Regional Court Judge

Judges:                            Ewa Karwowska, Regional Court Judge;

Monika Bukała-Steinborn, Regional Court Judge

having examined on 13th November 2019, in Gdańsk, at a session in camera, the case brought by A. S. (1) – representative of the group consisting of [data of 171 members of the group] against (…) JSC with its registered office in S. for authorization to perform substitution,

Decision of the Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, dated 14th October 2019
I C 1664/18

  1. The requirement of the uniformity of the factual and legal basis of the group members’ demands is considered to be met when the group members derive their claims from the same event, i.e., from agreements concluded separately by each group member with the defendant, which contain practically identical provisions regarding the obligation.
  2. Given the identical nature of the provisions concerning contractual obligations, it is irrelevant that some of them were included in preliminary sales agreements and some in development agreements.

Decision of the Court of Appeal in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, dated 3rd December 2013
I ACz 2089/13

The Court of Appeal in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge:            Barbara Górzanowska, Judge of the Court of Appeal

Judges:                            Maria Kus-Trybek, Judge of the Court of Appeal;

Władysław Pawlak, Judge of the Court of Appeal (Judge – Rapporteur)

having examined on 3rd December 2013, in Kraków, at a session in camera, the case brought by W.G., representative of a group consisting of [data of 14 group members], against W.N. for payment

 

Decision of the Regional Court in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, dated 5th October 2015
I C 138/13

The Regional Court in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge:            Kamil Grzesik, Regional Court Judge

Judges:                            Marta Woźniak, Regional Court Judge;

Wojciech Żukowski, Regional Court Judge

having examined on 5th October 2015, in Kraków, at a hearing, the case brought by W.G., representative of a group consisting of [data of 14 group members] against W.N. for payment,

decides to:

Decision of the Regional Court in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, dated 28th June 2013
I C 138/13

The Regional Court in Kraków, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge:                     Kamil Grzesik, Regional Court Judge

Judges:                                      Marta Woźniak, Regional Court Judge;

Wojciech Żukowski, District Court Judge (delegated)

having examined on 28th June 2013, at a hearing, the case brought by W.G., representative of a group consisting of [data of 14 group members] against W.N. for payment

decides to:

1 5 6 7 8 9 51