Decision of the Regional Court in Krakow, Civil Division I, dated October 28, 2014
I C 862/12

The Regional Court in Krakow, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge: SSO Izabella Dyka

Judges:                 SSO Elżbieta Bednarczuk, SSO Kamil Grzesik

having examined on October 28, 2014, in Krakow, at a closed session, the case brought by D. N. – representative of a group consisting of: [data of 49 persons], against (…) with its registered office in N. for payment

Decision of the Court of Appeal in Krakow, Civil Division I, dated March 26, 2014
I ACz 417/14

  1. At the initial stage of the proceedings, which is the filing of a lawsuit and the court’s analysis of the possibility of hearing the case in summary proceedings, the assessment is, by its nature, based on the facts presented by the members of the group in the lawsuit filed; the domain of further proceedings conducted by the court, which will result in a judgment being issued in the case, is, among other things, to verify the claims and factual circumstances presented by the members of the group; the basis for issuing a decision on the admissibility of the case in class action proceedings is the claim filed by the plaintiff and the factual circumstances contained therein, compared with the provisions of Articles 1 and 2 of the Act on Pursuing Claims in Class Action Proceedings.
  2. Securing the costs of proceedings in class action proceedings is optional. The court makes a decision in this regard after analyzing the request submitted by the defendant.

Decision of the Regional Court in Krakow, 1st Civil Division, dated November 28, 2013
I C 862/12

The Regional Court in Krakow, 1st Civil Division, composed of the following:

Presiding Judge: SSO Izabella Dyka

Judges:                 SSO Paweł Darmoń, SSO Kamil Grzesik

having examined on November 28, 2013, in Krakow, at a hearing the case brought by D. N. – representative of a group consisting of: [data of 49 persons] against (…) with its registered office in N. for payment

Decision of the Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, dated June 7, 2021
I C 1664/18

The Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, composed of the following:

Presiding Judge: SSO Mariusz Bartnik

Judges:                  SSO Ewa Karwowska, SSO Monika Bakuła-Steinborn

having examined on June 7, 2021, in Gdańsk, at a closed session, the case brought by A. S. (1) – representative of the group consisting of [data of 2 group members] and others against (…) S.A. with its registered office in S. for authorization to act as a substitute,

Decision of the Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, dated June 21, 2019
I C 1664/18

The Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, composed of the following:

Presiding Judge:           SSO Mariusz Bartnik

having examined on June 21, 2019, in Gdańsk, at a closed session, the case brought by A. S. – representative of the group against (…) S.A. with its registered office in S. for authorization to perform actions at the expense of the defendant,

Decision of the Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, of November 13, 2019
I C 1664/18

The Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, composed of the following:

Presiding Judge:           SSO Mariusz Bartnik

Judges:                           SSO Ewa Karwowska, SSO Monika Bukała-Steinborn

having examined on November 13, 2019, in Gdańsk, at a closed session, the case brought by A. S. (1) – representative of the group consisting of [171 members of the group] against (…) S.A. with its registered office in S. for authorization to perform substitution,

Decision of the Regional Court in Gdańsk, 1st Civil Division, of October 14, 2019
I C 1664/18

  1. The requirement for the factual and legal basis of the group members’ claims to be identical is considered to be met when the group members derive their claims from the same event, i.e., from agreements concluded separately by each group member with the defendant, which contain virtually identical provisions regarding the obligation.
  2. Given the identical nature of the provisions concerning contractual obligations, it is irrelevant that some of them were included in preliminary sales agreements and some in development agreements.

Decision of the Court of Appeal in Krakow, 1st Civil Division, dated December 3, 2013
I ACz 2089/13

The Court of Appeal in Krakow, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge: SSA Barbara Górzanowska

Judges:                 SSA Maria Kus-Trybek, SSA Władysław Pawlak (rep.)

having examined on December 3, 2013, in Krakow, in a closed session, the case brought by W.G., representative of a group consisting of [data of 14 group members], against W.N. for payment

Decision of the Regional Court in Krakow, 1st Civil Division, dated October 5, 2015
I C 138/13

The Regional Court in Krakow, 1st Civil Division, composed of:

Presiding Judge: SSO Kamil Grzesik

Judges:                 SSO Marta Woźniak, SSO Wojciech Żukowski

having examined on October 5, 2015, in Krakow, at a hearing the case brought by W.G., representative of a group consisting of [data of 14 group members] against W.N. for payment,

Decision of the Regional Court in Krakow, 1st Civil Division, dated June 28, 2013
I C 138/13

The Regional Court in Krakow, 1st Civil Division, composed of the following:

Presiding Judge: SSO Kamil Grzesik

Judges: SSO Marta Woźniak, SSR Wojciech Żukowski (delegated)

having examined on June 28, 2013, at a hearing the case brought by W.G., representative of a group consisting of [data of 14 group members] against W.N. for payment

1 5 6 7 8 9 51